Post By: Vishwanath Iyer Published on: December 15, 2016 Reading time: 7 minutes
We can define free-will as any action (karma) that is independent and not influenced by external or internal stimulus.
Firstly, Brahman, that sea of infinite tranquillity, seeks to know itself, it seeks the answer of the question, “who am I?” This leads the Brahman to creating an image of itself called Puruṣa/ Śiva.
In fact, Brahman sacrifices itself into itself to enable Puruṣa/ Śiva (primordial Identity) to emerges from it.
Importantly, this primordial sacrifice of Brahman into itself is called Ādhiyajña. Additionally, in Śrīmad Bhagavad Gītā, Chapter 8v4, Śrī Kṛṣṇa says that he is Ādhiyajña. This means that Śrī Kṛṣṇa is embedded in every sacrifice and the source of karma.
The first karma occurs as union (yoga) between Brahman and itself in the creation of Puruṣa/ Śiva (primordial Identity) as a response the question “Who am I”?
However, this primordial manifestation of Puruṣa/ Śiva, only creates an Identity, but not the confirmation that it exists and is valid. So, to answer this question, Prakṛti/ Śakti manifest from Puruṣa/ Śiva. Consequently, Prakṛti/ Śakti weaves with Puruṣa/ Śiva in a dance (laya) called tantra. This weave is a yoga of Puruṣa with Prakṛti.
However, even with the emergence of Prakṛti/ Śakti from Puruṣa/ Śiva, Brahman is still unable to get the confirmation of existence it seeks. Hence, the karma-yoga of Puruṣa/ Śiva with Prakṛti/ Śakti yields no result and Brahman continues to remain in a state of anxiety.
However, this changes when the weave of Puruṣa/ Śiva with Prakṛti/ Śakti finds another weave of Puruṣa/ Śiva with Prakṛti/ Śakti and form another union (yoga).
Furthermore, this bonds results in give and take between the entities. However, this give and take is never equal, so one entity gives more to the other. The one who will give more is the one who is more afraid of losing the bond.
Here, the one who gives more has no free-will on account of fear of losing its identity. However, the one who gets more has the free-will bandwidth to equalise the imbalance. However, this will require enormous situational awareness (prajñā) and maturity/ cultivation (pakvatā).
Consequently, this imbalance in give and take results in a debt (ṛṇa), resulting in a bond of debt (ṛṇānubandhana) that all entities need to reconcile. This reconciliation process is called saṃsāra (cycle of birth and death), but more significantly, this means that entities lose free-will in the choice of rebirth options.
As these entities begin to bond with other entities, depending on the mix of attributes (guṇa), first the primordial elements (pañcabhūta) are created. Slowly, more complex entities and depending on their cultivation or maturity (pakvatā), they become insentient (jadam) or sentient (jīva).
Furthermore, as they reach the acme of maturity (pakvatā), which is as human beings, entities are thrown into a maelstrom of karma, debt creation and reconciliation.
We have already established the following,
To begin, we act when we are motivated from within or when there is an outside stimulus.
The internal motivation for action comes from perception of a gap between ideal and current state. This is called saṅkalpa (sam = equal + kalpa =idea/ hypothesis), which means bridging the gap. However, it is important to recognise that this perception of inadequacy itself comes from dharma or natural state.
Hence, this internal motivation or saṅkalpa may come from fear of loss of identity or perception of a gap arising from conditioning (dharma), so the bandwidth of free-will seems small or even insignificant.
When the stimulus comes from an external source, obviously, the first trigger would be,
If these two points were to be triggered, then the reaction would be fight or flight, the intensity depending on the impact of stress on the sense of self-worth (asmitā).
If one were to reflect, then one will quickly realise that all our actions can be categorised as being driven by past debts (prārabdha-karma) or current conditioning – dharma (DNA + family + school and environment).
The area of sacrifice (yajña) is an area that we control. When we decide not to respond, respond without the desire for achievement or sacrifice the outcome/ credit selflessly, then this goes outside the actions propelled by attributes (guṇa) or by fear of loss of identity (asmitā). Additionally, this negates the generation of debt and transcends conditioning.
In fact, we can increase our free-will bandwidth by practicing austerity (tapas). Also, the starting point of the effort would be behaviour modulation through yama (controlled reaction to stimulus) and niyama (internal assimilation of stimulus).
Six key elements in yama which cover most aspects of behaviour with the external environment are non-violence (ahiṃsā), truth or integrity (satya), sexual continence (brahmacarya), non-stealing (asteya), and equanimity (aparigrāhya) and diet control (mitāhāra)
Niyama has 6 elements: śaucam (hygiene), santoṣam (contentment), svādhyāyam (introspection), tapas (austerity), śraddhā (dedication), and dānam (charity).
As we become competent in the practice of yama and niyama, our bandwidth of free-will increases. Over time, as we increase practice of austerity (tapas), our situational awareness (prajñā) steadies and we get complete control over our free-will (sthithaprajñā).